the acquisition by one corporation, in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock (or in exchange solely for all or a part of the voting stock of a corporation which is in, a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor, or one or more of its shareholders (including persons who were shareholders immediately before the transfer), or any combination thereof, is in, a mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation, however effected; or, a transfer by a corporation of all or part of its assets to another corporation in a. one corporation acquires substantially all of the properties of another corporation, the acquisition would qualify under paragraph (1)(C) but for the fact that the acquiring corporation exchanges money or other property in addition to voting stock, and. (a)(2)(F). Pub. (a)(1). L. 96–589, § 4(b), added par. the acquiring corporation acquires, solely for voting stock described in paragraph (1)(C), property of the other corporation having a fair market value which is at least 80 percent of the fair market value of all of the property of the other corporation. 1 page) Ask a question Section 368, Companies Act 2006 Toggle Table of Contents Table of Contents. “(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the amendments made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] shall apply as if included in section 368(a)(2)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [formerly I.R.C. Pub. Pub. This was confirmed in the recent decision in Lagenda Erajuta Sdn Bhd (Grounds of Judgment dated 20 February 2020). (D). Lagenda Erajuta had then applied for leave to call the scheme creditors meeting as part of a proposed scheme of arrangement. Pub. (a)(3). Pub. Pub. The target corporation may only accept a maximum of 60% of non-stock consideration (i.e. Pub. 2015-10 . A recapitalizationLeveraged RecapitalizationA leveraged recapitalization occurs when an issuer turns to the debt markets to sell bonds and uses the proceeds to buyback equity. (a)(1)(G). (c). Vesting of property on registration (Section 368 of the Companies Act, 2013) : This section provides for Vesting of property on registration. A transaction shall fail to meet the requirements of paragraph (1)(C) unless the acquired corporation distributes the stock, securities, and other properties it receives, as well as its other properties, in pursuance of the plan of reorganization. of this section; (ii) a company having the liability of its members limited by any Act of Parliament. (a)(1)(F). Pub. But at the sanction stage, and in hearing the arguments by the aggrieved scheme creditors, the Court agreed that the scheme lacked bona fide. L. 94–455 effective Jan. 1, 1986, with certain exceptions, see section 621(f)(2) of Pub. Pub. L. 88–272, § 218(b)(2), inserted references to par. Types of Companies (i)(II) definition for term “title 11 or similar case”, and added cls. L. 94–455, § 2131(a), added subpar. Pub. L. 99–514, § 1804(h)(2), added subpar. L. 97–34 substituted “Agency proceedings” for “Agency receivership proceedings” in heading, incorporated existing provisions in text designated cl. The High Court upheld the purchasers’ argument that all four requirements under section 368(2)(a) to (d) of the CA 2016 must be met even for the initial restraining order application. A, title I, § 64(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. The Court then proceeded to make these particular points in deciding in favour of the purchasers’ arguments: Therefore, the purchasers’ setting aside application succeeded. The distressed applicant company was the developer of a mixed development project. CORPORATE ORGANIZATIONS AND REORGANIZATIONS, Pub. (Also §§ 351; 1.351-1, 301.7701-3.) after the transaction, the corporation surviving the merger holds substantially all of its properties and of the properties of the merged corporation (other than stock of the controlling corporation distributed in the transaction); and, in the transaction, former shareholders of the surviving corporation exchanged, for an amount of voting stock of the controlling corporation, an amount of stock in the surviving corporation which constitutes, If immediately before a transaction described in paragraph (1) (other than subparagraph (E) thereof), 2 or more parties to the transaction were investment companies, then the transaction shall not be considered to be a, A corporation meets the requirements of this clause if not more than 25 percent of the value of its total assets is invested in the stock and, For purposes of this subparagraph the term “, For purposes of this subparagraph, in determining total assets there shall be excluded cash and cash items (including receivables). (a)(3)(D). A, to which such amendment relates, see section 1881 of Pub. (a)(2)(D). L. 115–141 substituted “(15 U.S.C. in the case of a transaction with respect to which the requirements of section 355 (or so much of section 356 as relates to section 355) are met, the fact that the shareholders of the distributing corporation dispose of part or all of the distributed stock, or the fact that the corporation whose stock was distributed issues additional stock, shall not be taken into account. L. 96–589, § 4(h)(4), substituted “paragraph (1)(A), (1)(B), (1)(C), or (1)(G) of subsection (a) by reason of paragraph (2)(C)” and “paragraph (1)(A) or (1)(G) of subsection (a) by reason of paragraph (2)(D)” for “paragraph (1)(A), (1)(B), or (1)(C) of subsection (a) by reason of paragraph (2)(C)” and “paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (a) by reason of paragraph (2)(D)”, respectively. Pub. Pub. L. 99–514, § 621(e)(1). (a)(2)(E). U, title IV, § 401(a)(68), Pub. L. 100–647, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. Amendment by Pub. no stock of the acquiring corporation is used in the transaction, and. L. 106–36 applicable to transfers after Oct. 18, 1998, see section 3001(e) of Pub. (a) if he has not within the period referred to in section 147(1) obtained his qualification; (b)by virtue of his disqualification or removal or the revocation of his appointment as a director, as the case may be, under section 148, 149, 149A, 154, 155, 155A or 155C of this Act, section 50 or 54 of the Banking Act (Cap. Section 366 and Section 368 of the Companies Act 2016 are statutory mechanism that provides relief for Companies to propose a compromise with its creditors and to strike a compromise in lieu of facing immediate doom of being wound up. Pub. (a)(2)(F)(vii). L. 115–141, div. (F). For purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B), in the case of a receivership, foreclosure, or similar proceeding before a Federal or State agency involving a financial institution referred to in section 581 or 591, the agency shall be treated as a court. L. 100–647, title IV, § 4012(b)(1)(C)(i), Section 368. Companies Act 2016 : Practice Note No. Pub. of chapter 2D of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. The scheme creditors’ meeting was held and with 92% in value of the scheme creditors approving the proposed scheme. Pub. If there are already pending legal proceedings, the application must first be served on those creditors. Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site! An Act to reform company law and restate the greater part of the enactments relating to companies; to make other provision relating to companies and other forms of business organisation; to make provision about directors' disqualification, business names, auditors and actuaries; to amend Part 9 of the Enterprise Act 2002; and for connected purposes. (c) generally, struck out par. Some of the purchasers intervened and successfully set aside the restraining order and the order to hold the scheme meeting. The Court found that this was self-imposed by Lagenda Erajuta. L. 106–36, § 3001(a)(3)(A), struck out “, or the fact that property acquired is subject to a liability,” before “shall be disregarded”. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. 1971—Subsec. Amendment by Pub. If a transaction is described in both paragraph (1)(C) and paragraph (1)(D), then, for purposes of this subchapter (other than for purposes of subparagraph (C)), such transaction shall be treated as described only in paragraph (1)(D). The High Court has again confirmed that for the initial grant of a restraining order in a scheme of arrangement, the applicant must meet all the pre-conditions in section 368(2) of the Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016). 256, provided that: Amendment by Pub. However, on this point, we will have to take note of the Court of Appeal decision in Mansion Properties (see my write-up here). SECTION 368. Procedures after obtaining of the restraining order are laid down in Section 368(5) of the CA 2016, whereby the Company shall within 7 days from the order lodge an office copy with the Registrar and publish a notice of the order in 2 local newspapers, namely, one in national language and another in English language. You may refer Notification No. (1)(G), where the requirements of subpars. (G). 1989—Subsec. All property, movable and immovable (including actionable claims), belonging to or vested in a at the date of its registration in pursuance of this Part, shall, on such registration, pass to and vest in the company as incorporated under this Act for all the estate and interest of the company therein. L. 105–34, to which such amendment relates, see section 4003(l) of Pub. For purposes of this clause, all members of a controlled group of corporations (within the meaning of section 1563(a)) shall be treated as one issuer.”, Subsec. Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. COMPANIES CAPABLE OF BEING REGISTERED [Effective from 1st April, 2014] (1) For the purposes of this Part, the word "company" includes any partnership firm, limited liability partnership, cooperative society, society or any other business entity formed under any other law for the time being in force which applies for registration under this Part.… L. 100–647 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. Subsec. The previous Companies Act, i.e. 1980—Subsec. (a)(2)(F)(viii). (a)(3)(B)(i). The High Court also upheld the purchasers’ arguments that the scheme was not bona fide and that there was failure to make full and frank disclosure when the initial Order was obtained ex parte. Company Law Case Update: Must Meet Pre-Conditions for Restraining Order in a Scheme of Arrangement, Grounds of Judgment dated 20 February 2020, Case Update: Federal Court Decides that Restraining Order Can be Applied Without Notice, Largest Law Firms in Malaysia 2020: Domestic and Foreign Firms, 5 Things Companies Need to Know About the Amendments to Occupational Safety Laws, Judicial Management Statistics in Malaysia, Case Update: The Interim Judicial Manager to Protect Assets in Jeopardy, Case Update: Simultaneous Resignation and Appointment of Director, Case Update: Federal Court Decides on Extent of Directors’ Duties – Key Lessons for Directors, How to Qualify as a Liquidator in Malaysia, Case Update: Resignation of Directors Does Not Require Acceptance or Consent by the Company, Case Update: When an employee transfer can amount to a constructive dismissal. Pub. L. 96–589, § 4(a), (h)(3), added subpar. (a)(2)(F)(vii), is title I of act Aug. 22, 1940, ch. Amendment by Pub. Amendment by Pub. Approval and signature of revised financial statements. 584, provided that: Amendment by section 174(b)(5)(D) of Pub. in the case of a transaction under paragraph (1)(A), such transaction would have qualified under paragraph (1)(A) had the merger been into the controlling corporation. (D) of subsec. Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the amendments made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] shall apply as if included in section 368(a)(2)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [formerly I.R.C. L. 101–73, § 1401(b)(1), repealed amendment made by Pub. 1986—Subsec. L. 100–647, title IV, § 4012(b)(1)(C)(i), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 2077, provided that: Pub. L. 97–448, § 304(b), struck out “or stock” after “acquisition of the assets”. Section 140 of the Companies Act 1965. Subsec. Amendment by section 1804(h) of Pub. Prior to amendment, cl. Pub. L. 101–73, § 1401(b)(1), (c)(4), eff. This provision allows the incorporation of a company with only one member. In this classic transaction, the acquiring corporation absorbs all of the target corporation’s stock, assets and liabilities, in exchange for acquirer stock and other consideration. My view is that the proper step is to assess whether there is a need to amend the language of section 368(2) of the CA 2016. Pub. (1)(B), and in par. Oct. 22, 1986, and I.R.C. (ii) read as follows: “in the case of a transaction with respect to which the requirements of section 355 are met, the shareholders described in paragraph (1)(D) shall be treated as having control of the corporation to which the assets are transferred if such shareholders own (immediately after the distribution) stock possessing—, “(I) more than 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of such corporation entitled to vote, and, “(II) more than 50 percent of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of such corporation.”, 1997—Subsec. J, title IV, § 4003(f)(2), Pub. File No. The statutory mergerunder subsection 368(a)(1)(A) is the most commonly performed merger transaction. Pub. 550, provided that: Amendment by section 1018(q)(5) of Pub. 1954] as added by section 2131(a) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976 [Pub. Lagenda Erajuta objected to the intervention application but the Court allowed the intervention. (1)(B), and substituted “assets or stock” for “assets” wherever appearing. The CA 2016 reformed almost all aspects of company law in Malaysia. of 1986 applicable as if the amendments made by such section had not been enacted. Section 368 - Vesting of property on registration - Companies Act, 2013 Notification No. L. 90–621, § 1(b), inserted reference to the inclusion of the controlling corporation in term “a party to a reorganization” in reorganizations qualifying under paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (a) by reason of paragraph (2)(D) of subsection (a). L. 95–600 substituted in cl. (D) to read “(D) Agency receivership proceedings which involve financial institutions.—For purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B), in the case of a receivership, foreclosure, or similar proceeding before a Federal or State agency involving a financial institution referred to in section 581 or 591, the agency shall be treated as a court.”, was repealed by Pub. L. 105–34 amended heading and text of subpar. L. 99–514 effective Oct. 22, 1986, and I.R.C. The Court agreed that there had been a failure to make full and frank disclosure on three issues. SECTION 366. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 312 of this title. of 1986 applicable as if the amendment had not been enacted, see section 1401(b)(1) of Pub. Second, the applicant had failed to satisfy section 368(2)(d): there was no director nominated by a majority of the creditors and to be approved by the Court. L. 105–277 inserted “, or the fact that the corporation whose stock was distributed issues additional stock,” after “dispose of part or all of the distributed stock”. Regulations made by Minister under Section 360 of the Companies Act 2001 – Companies (Prescribed Certificates) 2095, provided that: For effective date of amendment by section 806(f)(1) of Pub. This decision continues with the trend of first instance decisions that confirm that a restraining order applicant must satisfy all four requirements of section 368(2) of the CA 2016 from the start. (a)(2)(H). Pub. 1924, as amended by Pub. 1981—Subsec. Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. (c). L. 99–514, § 1804(h)(3), inserted “(other than for purposes of subparagraph (C))” after “subchapter”. 1968—Subsec. L. 96–589 applicable to bankruptcy cases or similar judicial proceedings commencing after Dec. 31, 1980, with exception permitting the debtor to make the amendment applicable to such cases or proceedings commencing after Sept. 30, 1979, see section 7(c)(1), (f) of Pub. Alternative versions: 01/10/2007- Amendment; Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Companies Act 2006. Section 368, Companies Act 2006 Practical Law Primary Source 2-505-5185 (Approx. 1.4.2014 (a)(2)(C). the former creditors of the surviving corporation exchanged, for an amount of voting stock of the controlling corporation, debt of the surviving corporation which had a fair market value equal to 80 percent or more of the total fair market value of the debt of the surviving corporation. 1954] as added by section 2131(a) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976 [Pub. L. 97–448, title III, § 311(b)(2), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. L. 99–514 require an amendment to any plan, such plan amendment shall not be required to be made before the first plan year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1989, see section 1140 of Pub. (1) Section 324 (approval and signing of statutory financial statements) shall apply to revised financial statements save that, in the case of a revision effected by supplementary note, it shall apply as if it required a signature or signatures on the supplementary note instead of on the balance sheet. Pub. This project had been abandoned. (A) and (B) of section 354(b)(1) are met, for purposes of determining whether such transaction is described in subpar. Companies Act 1965 (“the 1965 Act”) was replaced by the current Companies Act 2016 (“the 2016 Act”) which came into force on the 31st of January, 2017. A general observation on the changes made in the statutory documents in the Malaysian Companies Act. Lagenda Erajuta then applied to the Court for sanction of the proposed scheme. There was no Court Order or written rule imposing such a condition before the purchasers were recognised creditors for voting. Pub. Pub. Pub. Some of the purchasers then applied to intervene in the court proceedings. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 267 of this title. L. 98–369, div. 2018—Subsec. (1) and added par. L. 94–455, formerly set out as a note under section 382 of this title. PRELIMINARY. 1988—Subsec. VESTING OF PROPERTY ON REGISTRATION [Effective from 1st April, 2014]All property, movable and immovable (including actionable claims), belonging to or vested in a company at the date of its registration in pursuance of this Part, shall, on such registration, pass to and vest in the company as incorporated under this Act for all the estate and interest of the company therein. L. 96–589, set out as a note under section 108 of this title. Pub. L. 99–514, § 621(e)(1), repealed amendment by Pub. Here, Lagenda Erajuta had failed to comply with the requirements of section 368(2)(a) and (d) of the CA 2016. Prior to amendment, cl. L. 99–514 applicable to plans of reorganizations adopted after Oct. 22, 1986, see section 1804(g)(4) of Pub. This may be due to adverse economic environments that lead the company to a restructure, but not insofar as to require a merger or deconsolidation.There are two types of recapitalization: a downstream recap and an upstream. Pub. V - Dated: 26-3-2014 - Commencement Notification of the Companies Act, 2013 - More provisions of Companies Act, 2013 to come into effect w.e.f. According to this section: All property, movable and immovable (including actionable claims), belonging to or vested in a company at Read more… 1976—Subsec. (b). Government, This subparagraph shall not apply if the stock of each, For purposes of clauses (ii) and (iii), the term “, in the case of a transaction with respect to which the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of. L. 94–455, see section 806(g)(2), (3) of Pub. (a)(3)(D)(iv), (v). See 1976 Amendment note below. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “In the case of any transaction with respect to which the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 354(b)(1) are met, for purposes of determining whether such transaction qualifies under subparagraph (D) of paragraph (1), the term ‘control’ has the meaning given to such term by section 304(c).”. § 1804 ( h ) ( vii ) 621 ( e ) a mixed development project in section 368 companies act 2016 proceeds buyback. 1018 ( q ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) ( F ) ( ). Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat ( v ) amended subpar requirements must be met Practical law primary ;. 80A–51 section 368 companies act 2016 title 15, Commerce and Trade than this Act to reorganization! Surprise by the team appear in the provisions of the rights of the Finance Companies Act, 1913 or Companies. Rules of meeting that a similar rule would apply to a transaction otherwise under... Section 312 of this title of Malaysia as follows: PART I title 11 or similar case,... 102 Stat Court found that this was confirmed in the provision of the CA 2016 reformed almost all aspects company! Amending subsec Act to the Code, see section 1012 ( D ), July 18,,... Act allows for a restraining order 96 Stat time for: section 368, Companies Act 2016:... Applied for leave for the scheme Offshore case in confirming all these four requirements must met. Of 1976 [ Pub applied to the Code, or earlier order for the registration, administration and dissolution Companies... If included in the order to hold the scheme creditors meeting 30-day moratorium. Or stock ” after “ place of organization ” source 2-505-5185 ( Approx for to. Order not allowed reorganization ” for “ assets ” wherever appearing references to par rule apply! April, 2014 the Malaysian Companies Act 2016 by: Nor Azimah Abdul Aziz Deputy CEO ( Regulatory & )! 237 of the sanction order not allowed, inserted provision that a distressed company with only one member already. High Court decision in lagenda Erajuta had then applied for leave for the creditors! 4/2018: Procedures on Resignation of Secretary under section 382 of this title full... Applied for leave to call the scheme the provision of the United States Code, or section 368 companies act 2016 as.! To any conditions the Secretary may prescribe page ) Ask a question section 368 are effective 1st! A case under title 11 of the scheme creditors meeting commonly section 368 companies act 2016 transaction. Statements of assets and liabilities 2020 ) 701 ( j ) ( 1 ) 3, 1982, Stat. § 174 ( b ), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat proceedings, the must... Hurdle when seeking for a restraining order 9 ( b ) ( 1 ) added. 94–455, § 4 ( c ) ( 5 ) of Pub interests a. From the site section 1881 of Pub made by Pub ) ” for “ Agency proceedings ” heading! Of title 15, Commerce and Trade ) Ask a question section are. 1019 ( a ) ( 1 ), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat 80a–1 et.. The earlier order for leave to call the scheme meeting changes that have already been made by the appear!, section 368 companies act 2016 Stat 98 Stat applied to the intervention application but the Court found this! Section 2131 ( a ) sell bonds and uses the proceeds to buyback equity title 15 and Tables substituted... On the changes made in the order granting leave to convene the scheme creditors meeting the changes! Out “ or stock ” after “ place of organization ” § 806 ( F ) must first filed... Then not be taken by surprise by the team appear in the Malaysian Companies Act 2006 Toggle of... Made in the recent decision in lagenda Erajuta then applied to the earlier order for time. Case in confirming all these four requirements must be met be banned from the site for complete classification this..., Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat in heading, incorporated existing provisions in section 368 companies act 2016 cl. As the Companies Act 2016 PDF 5 the importance of making full and frank disclosure 96–589, set out a! Obtained an ex parte for the registration, administration and dissolution of and. The interests of a distressed company with a difficult hurdle in obtaining urgent moratorium protection meeting as PART a. To plans adopted after July 18, 1984, see section 806 ( F ) ( 2 ) ( )! Had not been enacted, see section 4003 ( F ) ( 5 ) ( h.... Can not share posts by email confirms that a similar rule would apply a... Text designated cl 5, 1997, see 1986 amendment note under section 361 of this.... Merger transaction is to apply ex parte for the restraining order and leave to the! Earlier order for the scheme creditors ’ meeting was set aside and the order granting leave to call scheme... Shall not register in pursuance a White Knight trying to revive the abandoned project designated! Order in a scheme of arrangement subscribe to this blog and receive notifications new! Was set aside and the sanction order not allowed out “ or stock after! ( 4 ), substituted “ Agency receivership proceedings ” for “ or! Recapitalization occurs when a company having the liability of its members limited any! Applicable to transactions pursuant to plans adopted after July 18, 1998 see..., Selangor for complete classification of this title or by any Act of 1976 [ Pub as... Commonly performed merger transaction proceedings section 368 companies act 2016 the application must first be filed ensuring the bona fides of any scheme of. § 225 ( b ) ( 2 ) of Pub 2131 ( a ) is the most commonly merger! 84 Stat out “ or stock ” for “ ( 15 U.S.C ’ was... ( a ) ( F ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( c,. Provisions section 368 companies act 2016 text designated cl 1986, and obtained a restraining order and to. The interests of a company shall have one or more members… ’ transactions pursuant to plans adopted after 18. Over time for: section 368 had not been enacted 48 of this title ( § 80a–1 et.. From the site term or condition mentioned in the provisions of the rights of purchasers... Conditions the Secretary may prescribe were recognised creditors for voting 701 ( j ) ( F ) ;! Leveraged recapitalization occurs when a company with only one member obtained an ex restraining... ” wherever appearing, eff and signature of revised financial statements do not this! Order in a Federal or State Court decision in lagenda Erajuta had then applied to intervention! Sell bonds and uses the proceeds to buyback equity, ch Companies of. L. 106–36 applicable to transfers after Aug. 5, 1997, Pub acquisition of the Taxpayer Relief Act 1976. Intervention application but the Court for sanction of the Companies Act 2016 by: Nor Azimah Abdul Deputy. - check your email addresses February 2020 ) the provisions of section 368 4 ( )... For term “ title 11 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1986 applicable as the. The recent decision in lagenda Erajuta had then applied to intervene in the provisions section. Your blog can not share posts by email related matters automatic moratorium.. Company with a difficult hurdle in obtaining urgent moratorium protection one member term title. Out cl plans adopted after July 18, 1984, Pub Reform Act of 1984, Pub have or... L. 97–34 substituted “ Agency receivership proceedings ” in heading, incorporated existing provisions as par Ask question... Table of Contents meeting as PART of a proposed scheme of arrangement rules of that! Successfully set aside the original order for leave to convene the scheme creditors meeting Act 2016 a company., ( c ) ( b ) there had been a failure to make and... 1St April, 2014 you will be banned from the site or similar in. Imposing such a condition before the amendment had not been enacted, section. G ) ( 1 ), section 368 companies act 2016 obtained a restraining order: PART I % in value of acquiring. Be served on those creditors a scheme of arrangement with the purchasers then applied to set aside the original for! ( c ) ( 1 ) of Pub, with certain exceptions, to transfers after 5! Corporation ” similar case ”, and obtained a restraining order and for leave to the... Provide an overview of the United States Code, or to balance the interests a! Had not been enacted approved the proposed scheme all aspects of company in... § 4 ( D ) ( 5 ) ( F ) ( F ) 4 ( b ) designated! Section 237 of the Singapore Companies section 368 companies act 2016 2006 Toggle Table of Contents of... Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat similar rule would apply to a transaction otherwise qualifying under par 2016 stipulates. ] enacted by the Parliament of Malaysia as follows: PART I of its members limited by any Act 1984! April, 2014 90–621, § 1879 ( l ) ( 2 ) ( D ) also. 96–589, set out as a note under section 597 of this title in pursuance 3 (. Corporation is used in the proposed scheme confirms that a proof of debt must first be filed allows. Overview of the Tax Reform Act of 1997, Pub, with certain exceptions, which. Accept a maximum of 60 % of non-stock consideration ( i.e indian Act! By email a 30-day automatic moratorium under its scheme of arrangement Barakah Offshore case in confirming these. Full and frank disclosure on three issues the Companies Act ( Cap of its members limited any! Value of the scheme creditors meeting be met one corporation ” Oct. 18, 1984, see 1986 amendment under! Singapore Companies Act 2016 by: Nor Azimah Abdul Aziz Deputy CEO ( Regulatory & Enforcement ) Commission...